
Summaries of Typical
Trident Environmental Projects

Map No. |
Project |
Major Activity Elements |
1 |
GPM
(Duke) Northwest Oklahoma |
Phase
I, II, and III Environmental Site Assessments, Hydrogeology, Risk
Assessment, Cost Recovery, Closure Negotiation |
2 |
Navajo
Refining Southeast New Mexico |
Remedial
Design and Construction, Hydrogeology, Air Sparging, Vapor Extraction,
Remediation Performance Monitoring, Regulatory Compliance/Permitting |
3 |
GPM
(Duke) Texas Panhandle |
Phase
I, II, and III Environmental Site Assessments, Hydrogeology, Risk
Assessment, Cost Recovery, Closure Negotiation |
4 |
GPM
(Duke)
Southeast New Mexico |
Environmental
Site Assessments, Hydrogeology, Natural Attenuation Monitoring, Regulatory
Negotiation |
5 |
Duke
Energy East Texas |
RCRA
Compliance, Program/Project Management, Soil Remediation, Hazardous Waste
Management, Environmental Site Assessment |
6 |
G
E Engine Services Winfield, Kansas |
Phase
I and II Environmental Site Assessment, Hazardous and Non-hazardous Waste
Stream Compliance Audit, Regulatory/Public Relations Evaluation, Health
and Safety Audit, Qualitative Risk Assessment |
7 |
Duke
Energy Permian Basin |
Waste
Characterization and Sampling, Waste Stream Review, Environmental
Compliance Audits, Waste Permitting and Manifesting |
8 |
Chevron
Pipe Line Permian Basin |
Phase
I Environmental Site Assessment, Non-hazardous Waste Stream Review,
Regulatory Review and Compliance Evaluation, Health and Safety Audit |
9 |
Farstad
Fractionation Plant Midland, TX |
Phase
I Environmental Site Assessment, Non-hazardous Waste Stream Review,
Regulatory Review and Compliance Evaluation, Health and Safety Audit |
10 |
Santa
Fe Resources West Texas |
Environmental
Site Assessment, Surface Geophysical Methods, Hydrogeology |
11 |
Price
Gramps Oil Field Southern CO |
Phase
I, II, and III Environmental Site Assessments, Hydrogeology, Risk
Assessment, Regulatory Negotiation, Oil Well Plugging Management and
Oversight, Waste Management |
12 |
UNOCAL
Corp. West Texas |
Natural
Attenuation, Environmental Site Assessment, Hydrogeology, Risk Assessment,
Regulatory Negotiation |
13 |
GPM
West Texas |
Mercury
Remediation Project Management, RCRA Compliance, Hazardous Waste
Management |
14 |
Yates
Petroleum Southeast NM |
Project
Management, Regulatory Compliance and Permitting, Hydrologic/Topographic
Evaluation |
15 |
GPM
Central Texas |
Phase
I, II, and III Environmental Site Assessments, Hydrogeology, Cost
Recovery/Negotiation Support |
16 |
Petroleum
Companies Permian Basin |
Environmental
Characterization, Regulatory Compliance/Permitting, Health and Safety
Training, Hydrogeology, Cost Analysis |
17 |
Various
Companies Throughout Texas |
LPST
Evaluation, Phase I, II, and III Environmental Site Assessments,
Hydrogeology, Risk Assessment, Regulatory Negotiation, Feasibility
Studies, Remedial Design/Remedial Action, Cost Reimbursement |
GPM
(Duke) Northwest Oklahoma
Environmental Site Assessments at Gas
Compressor and Meter Sites
Trident Environmental performed
environmental site assessments (ESAs) at 13 gas compressor sites and 50 meter
stations in the Anadarko Basin of Northwest Oklahoma.
The investigations were conducted to establish pre-acquisition baseline
conditions regarding hydrocarbon impacts to the soil and groundwater from
historic operations at each facility. The
results of the investigation were used to calculate costs of corrective action
for regulatory closure based on applicable Oklahoma Corporation Commission (OCC)
guidelines.
The gas compressor sites contained a variety of equipment configurations,
operational standards, and levels of maintenance within a wide range of
geographical and hydrogeological settings. Consequently,
an interpretation of site-specific environmental sensitivity was included based
on local topography, soil types, geology, and potential man-made exposure
pathways.
Trident was successful in quickly and efficiently identifying site operations
and equipment that represented potential environmental concerns, evaluating
those concerns by intrusive sampling, and determining the costs for additional
assessment, risk evaluation, remedation, and regulatory closure.
The primary deliverables to GPM were detailed cost evaluations
representative of several likely regulatory scenarios, characterization data
(ESA reports) upon which the cost evaluations were based, and continuous support
of the Trident Project Manager for consultations during the acquisition costs
negotiations.
The information generated from the project led to a fair settlement of
environmental costs which are currently being utilized to bring the purchased
compressor stations into regulatory compliance.
Additional corrective actions conducted by Trident include the following:
-
Completion of Risk-Based
Assessment Reports to identify sites for regulatory closure and establish
target clean-up levels for sites requiring remediation.
-
Regulatory closure of sites
through soil leaching modeling to verify the future protection of the
groundwater.
-
Performance of groundwater
monitoring to verify plume stability and justify regulatory closure.
-
Remedial action to recovery
phase-separated hydrocarbons.
Navajo Refining Company retained the Trident staff to design and install
a remediation system at a refinery in southeast New Mexico. A break in a
desalter line caused a release of residual petroleum hydrocarbons within the
vadose zone, separated-phase hydrocarbons (free product) on the water table, and
dissolved-phase hydrocarbons in the groundwater.
Because of the existence of numerous municipal water supply wells near
the site, an aggressive remediation system was designed and installed.
The remediation system consists of eight air sparging/soil vapor
extraction (AS/SVE) wells and one groundwater recovery well for source removal.
The system focuses on aggressive physical removal while simultaneously
stimulating naturally-occurring hydrocarbon degrading bacteria.
The soil vapors extracted by the AS/SVE system are
conveyed to the refinery boiler system were gas combustion takes place.
To monitor the performance of the AS/SVE system, monthly air samples of
the SVE exhaust are obtained and analyzed for BTEX (EPA Method 8021) and total
petroleum hydrocarbons (EPA Method 8015M - Gas Range).
After two years of continuous operation, the system recovered an
estimated 19,100 kilograms (8,700 lb.) of total volatile hydrocarbons (TVHC).
In addition, dissolved-phase hydrocarbon concentrations declined
significantly in the downgradient monitoring wells.
This decrease is attributed to the successful performance of the AS/SVE
system.
During
the first year of operation, total fluids (groundwater and phase-separated
hydrocarbons) were pumped from the recovery well to the refinery desalter unit
where the free product was recovered by an electrostatic oil/water separation
process along with other refinery discharge water.
The recovered water then underwent a steam stripping process prior to be
being released into the local publicly owned treatment works (POTW).
After 15 months of continuous operation, approximately 700,000 gallons of
total fluids were removed from the source area.
Decreases in product thickness measurements in monitoring wells located
near the source area are attributed to the successful removal of free product
from the recovery well. After 15
months, the total fluids recovery system, which consisted of a 3/4 horsepower
submersible pump in the recovery well, was replaced with a product only recovery
system. This upgrade was conducted
to increase efficiency of recovering free product and to provide a more accurate
accounting of product recovery volumes. Since
the existing AS/SVE system had proven to be very effective at removing the
dissolved hydrocarbons, groundwater recovery with a submersible pump
was no longer necessary. After nine
months of operation, the pneumatically operated product recovery pump recovered
over 110 gallons of free product.
Based
on the results of the initial performance of the remediation system, groundwater
cleanup is expected to be completed within one to two years.
Trident personnel
performed environmental site assessment (ESAs) at 27 gas compressor sites in the
Anadarko Basin of Texas. The
investigations were conducted to establish pre-acquisition base-line conditions
regarding hydrocarbon impacts to the soil and groundwater from historic
operations at each facility. Cost
calculations for additional assessment and remediation were determined and
utilized in the purchase price negotiations.
Investigation methodologies and recommendations for further assessment or
remediation were based on a detailed understanding of all applicable state and
Federal regulations specific to each site location and operation.
The gas compressor sites contained a
variety of equipment, configurations, and operations within a range of
geographic settings. Consequently,
an interpretation of site-specific environmental sensitivity was conducted for
each station based on local topography, drainage relationships, soil types,
geology, and hydrology. Potential
man-made receptors, such as water wells and surface impoundments, were also
noted and evaluated in light of the risk to human health or livestock.
During the course of the investigations Trident used our significant experience
in quickly and efficiently identifying the site operations that represented
potential for environmental concern. In
addition to the present site operations, Trident personnel located and assessed
historic or reclaimed sites (such as former burn pits, petroleum storage areas,
and equipment placements) that have the potential for subsurface hydrocarbon
impacts, but are not readily apparent based on surface observations.
Of the 29 investigated sites, various levels of hydrocarbon impact were
encountered, including:
-
Sites with
hydrocarbon impacts to the soil that were below the expected regulatory
target concentrations and would likely achieve closure status without
further assessment
-
Sites with
significant but defined hydrocarbon impacts to the soil, requiring some
minor remediation or negotiated (risk-based) closure approval from the state
regulators
-
Sites with
deep hydrocarbon impacts to the soil that represent a threat or impact to
the groundwater that require soil remediation and, possibly, groundwater
monitoring or remediation prior to achieving closure status
-
Sites with
significant hydrocarbon impacts to the soil and groundwater requiring
remediation planning, negotiations with the regulators, and, possibly,
negotiations with the surface owners
Trident Environmental personnel were contracted to prepare
a remedial strategy work plan to address dissolved hydrocarbons in the
unconfined alluvial aquifer (Ogallala Formation) underlying several gas plant
facilities in southeast New Mexico.
Based on current and future land uses, the lack of potential receptors, and
historical water quality data, it was concluded that there is low risk with
respect to exposure to human health and the environment from the
hydrocarbon-impacted groundwater on site. Therefore,
monitoring the efficacy of natural attenuation by sampling the existing
monitoring wells on site was chosen as the most practical method for site
remediation.
The data collected to date demonstrates that the hydrocarbon-impacted soil and
groundwater associated with the site is contained well within the fenced
property boundaries. It is apparent
that natural attenuation processes have been effective in stabilizing the plume
and preventing continued downgradient migration due to the estimated age of the
release, groundwater velocity, and limited extent of the plume.
With the continuation of natural attenuation, the dissolved hydrocarbons
will be reduced and dissipate to background levels as long as there is no
additional source of hydrocarbons introduced on site.
Through periodic sampling and monitoring of groundwater conditions, the status
of plume migration or recession will be determined.
Analytical results of pertinent parameters such as benzene, toluene,
ethylbenzene, xylenes (BTEX), and electron acceptors (dissolved oxygen, nitrogen
and sulfate) will be used to make these conclusions.
As site conditions change with time, recommendations will be made with
respect to continued monitoring, monitoring frequency, and/or site closure.
The
New Mexico Oil Conservation Division (NMOCD) agreed with a request to reduce the
sampling and monitoring frequency from quarterly to semi-annually until the
plume finally meets remediation goals. After
each year of monitoring, the data will be evaluated to confirm that the benzene
plume is not migrating downgradient and document the progress of intrinsic
remediation. If the data confirms
that the plume is not migrating and that benzene concentrations are not
increasing, then site closure will be requested.
Trident Environmental personnel were
retained by a major natural gas gathering company to characterize the extent of
mercury-impacted soils at approximately 37 gas meter sites within a natural gas
gathering system and in the crawl space beneath a gas plant office building in
east Texas. Mercury manometers had
been used at most of the gas meter sites for gas flow measurement purposes.
During the 1970s the mercury meters were replaced by air diaphragm-type
meters and stored in the crawl space of the office building.
Based on the results of the sampling investigation it was determined that
approximately four meter sites and the crawl space would require remediation.
Based on the characterization results, a remediation work plan was written to
comply with applicable Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
requirements and detailed the field testing procedures to measure mercury
content in soils, sampling protocols, remediation procedures, and specifications
for treatment and disposal options. After
approval of the work plan by the Railroad Commission of Texas (RRC), excavation,
treatment, and disposal of the impacted soils was implemented.
After using heavy equipment (backhoe) and hand shovels to excavate approximately
18 cubic yards of soil from the four meter sites, the locations were restored to
mercury concentrations of less than 20 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).
The crawl space presented a bigger challenge because it was a
confined space. Thirty-two mercury meters were removed from the crawl space and
sent to a recycling facility in Minnesota. Mechanical
excavation of the crawl space was not feasible due to the limited work space.
A combination of hand shoveling and a heavy-duty industrial vacuum was
used to remove the mercury-impacted soil. Since
the crawl space is a confined space area, confined space permit procedures were
followed, as detailed in the health and safety plan.
Safety procedures included the use of supplied air respirators for the
two workers involved in the remediation of the crawl space.
An industrial vacuum generating head mounted on a 55-gallon drum powered
by a 185 cubic feet per minute air compressor was used to vacuum the loosened
soil. Hand excavation and vacuuming
of soil beneath the crawl space was performed until bedrock conditions were
encountered. As a precautionary
measure, a mercury vapor suppressant and decontamination liquid was sprayed on
the floor of the crawl space after excavation and vacuuming operations were
completed.
Remediation activities performed in the crawl space were
successful in the following:
-
Removing all visible mercury
-
Reducing total mercury
concentrations to levels below 45 mg/kg
-
Reducing mercury vapor
concentrations to levels below 0.025 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m3)
(the threshold limit value established by the American Conference of
Governmental Hygienists)
Since operational considerations, bedrock conditions, and the clients
requirement that the building remain in place made it infeasible to remove
additional material from the crawl space with mechanized equipment the 2 mg/kg
target cleanup level could not be achieved.
Therefore, the following remedial actions were proposed to the RRC to
insure the protection of the commercial workers who utilize the office space:
-
Limited entrance into the confined space to only
necessary utility repairs or other emergencies. Such entrances should only
be made while following confined space entry.
Permitting procedures until the area is determined to be safe
(mercury vapor analyzer [MVA] readings below 0.025 mg/m3).
Keep entrance to crawl space locked and posted with a sign labeled: CONFINED
SPACE ENTER BY PERMIT ONLY
-
Apply additional mercury vapor
suppressant to the crawl space floor such that it suppresses any residual
mercury vapors
-
Conduct quarterly MVA surveys
inside the office building to ensure worker safety
-
Conduct quarterly MVA surveys of
the crawl space for one year to ensure mercury vapor concentrations are
below 0.025 mg/m3 and determine any trend relationships of MVA
data over time
-
Following discontinuation of the
use of the office building, develop a work plan for removal of the building
and excavation of the soils containing residual mercury using heavy
equipment, similar to the methods used at the meter sites
It was determined that there is
low risk to potential exposure to mercury at the four meter sites since target
cleanup levels were achieved and there were no documented sensitive receptors
within Ό mile of the sites. Therefore,
a request was submitted to the RRC to acknowledge that no further corrective
action is warranted at these sites.
G
E Engine Services Winfield, Kansas
Phase I & II Environmental Site Assessment &
Compliance Audit at Large Manufacturing Facility
Trident personnel performed a Phase I
and II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) which included a Compliance Audit of
a 415,000 square foot manufacturing facility in Winfield, Kansas.
The investigation was conducted to establish pre-acquisition baseline
conditions regarding facility compliance issues, potential chemical impacts to
the soil or groundwater, and the historic health and safety record for workers
at the plant. The results of the
investigation were used to determine the applicability of existing facility
systems (waste storage, treatment, manufacturing, etc.) as related to future
utilization by the new owner.
The building and property contained a wide variety of equipment used in the
manufacturing, storage, packaging, and shipping of the product.
In addition, systems were present for the bulk storage of hazardous and
non-hazardous materials (liquids and solids), on-site treatment and disposal of
liquid waste streams, storage and shipment of hazardous and non-hazardous solid
waste, and environmental monitoring.
The Phase I/II ESA portion of the evaluation included the installation of three
monitoring wells associated with underground fuel and bulk material storage
tanks. Surface (wipe) sampling of
structures and equipment was conducted to determine the potential for
contamination from airborne metals (dust) and other chemicals associated with
the historic manufacturing processes.
The Compliance Audit portion of the evaluation required the completion of a
76-page, 300-question checklist, which covered all aspects of facility
operations, regulator oversight, waste handling (including off-site disposal),
monitoring, and employee safety.
Duke
Energy Permian Basin
Characterization and Management of Non-hazardous
Oil Field Waste at Various Gas Processing Facilities
Trident has performed general waste
characterization and disposal management services for Duke Energy Field Services
at several gas processing facilities in the Permian Basin.
Although many of the facilities were similar operationally, a wide
variety of solid waste types and disposal scenarios were encountered due to
recent facility upgrade and construction activities.
Characterization and management of the waste included a determination of source,
soil and materials sampling, review and selection of disposal options, permit
preparation, manifesting, and disposal oversight.
Following the completion of disposal events a brief report was prepared,
when required, to document the waste characterization data and final
disposition.
Chevron
Pipe Line Permian Basin
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and Limited
Compliance Audit of a Major Crude Oil Gathering System
Trident personnel performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA)
and Limited Compliance Audit of the West Texas Gathering System operated by the
Chevron Pipe Line Company. The
investigation was conducted at the request of Chevron to provide due diligence
information for potential pipeline system buyers.
The results of the investigation were used to demonstrate the current
condition of the system with respect to potential environmental liability and
document the spill history.
The West Texas Gathering System consists of eight major tank farms with
approximately 50 field booster pump stations and hundreds of miles of crude oil
pipeline. Each facility included
equipment for crude oil storage, transfer pumps, pigging connections, sumps,
chemical storage, electricity transmission, solid and liquid waste storage, and
areas of hydrocarbon impact to the soil.
The Limited Compliance Audit portion of the investigation required the review
and documentation of permits and exemptions associated with storm water, solid
waste, and air emissions. In
addition, a database of release report information from operator and regulatory
files were evaluated to identify higher risk sections of the pipeline and
demonstrate the effect of recent efforts to upgrade the system.
Farstad
Fractionation Plant Midland, TX
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and Limited
Compliance Audit of a Gas Fractionation Facility
Trident personnel performed a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) and Limited Compliance Audit of a 47-acre
gas fractionation plant in Midland County, Texas.
The investigation was conducted at the request of Duke Energy Field
Services to establish baseline conditions regarding facility compliance issues,
and potential chemical impacts to the soil, groundwater, or structures at the
plant. The results of the
investigation were used to calculate the potential liability associated with the
acquisition agreement.
The buildings, equipment, and property included railroad and truck loading
stations, aboveground liquid hydrocarbon storage tanks, treatment and processing
equipment, aboveground piping, a quality control laboratory, and a full service
truck fueling and service center. The
facility process and maintenance systems involved the storage of non-hazardous
bulk materials and the generation of non-hazardous wastes.
The Limited Compliance Audit portion of the evaluation required the review and
documentation of permits and exemptions associated with storm water, solid
waste, and air emissions. Historic
soil and groundwater monitoring samples, associated with a former underground
storage tank, were also reviewed to verify compliance with closure directives.
Trident
Environmental personnel conducted an electromagnetic conductivity (EM) survey at
an oil field for Santa Fe Resources in west Texas.
The survey was completed prior to a property transfer to determine if a
substantial environmental liability was present regarding high chloride and
sulfate levels reported in area water wells.
Since the oil field covered an approximately 2 mile by 3 mile area, the
EM survey provided a very cost effective method to identify potential sources of
dissolved chlorides and sulfates in the shallow groundwater table over a large
investigative area. Also, the EM
survey eliminated the need for any extensive groundwater monitoring well
installation and sampling operations.
A Geonics model EM34-3 electromagnetic conductivity meter
was used to measure apparent ground conductivity values at approximately
1,000-foot spacing across the entire oil field.
The EM survey was conducted to measure conductivity values and
qualitatively correlate these values with available groundwater quality data.
This correlation was used to determine potential sources of the high
chloride and sulfate concentrations observed in area water wells.
After
analysis of the survey results, Trident concluded that the source of the
chlorides and sulfates in two water supply wells were from past oil field
activities (former drilling pits). The
survey supported evidence that the magnitude and extent of impacted groundwater
was limited, and risk to the private water wells currently active in the subject
area was low.
The Price Gramps Oil Field is located within a pristine ecological
setting near wildlife areas, Federal wilderness, and recreational properties.
Closure was performed by Trident personnel under the regulatory guidance
of the Colorado Oil & Gas Conservation Commission (COGCC).
The project began with an initial Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
(ESA) to identify areas of potential environmental concern.
Each of these concerns were defined and evaluated during a Phase II ESA.
The estimated costs for complete closure and site restoration were
presented to the land owner/field operator and work was initiated for the
following elements:
-
Plugging and abandonment of 47
oil wells according to COGCC requirements
-
Closure of several large
formation water evaporation ponds
-
Disassembly, removal, and
salvage of oil production equipment, tubulars, tanks, treatment vessels, and
other related equipment
-
Assessment of
hydrocarbon-impacted groundwater and the performance of a risk evaluation
for regulatory closure
-
Assessment, removal, and
disposal of asbestos containing equipment and building material
-
Characterization and disposal of
Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material (NORM) containing tank bottom
material
-
Decompaction and restoration of
lease roads, well locations, tank battery sites, and operation facilities
A Trident project managers provided the
oversight for the multiple subcontractors used during the project and performed
the regulatory negotiations to ensure proper permits were in-place and the
activities were conducted in compliance with the current rules.
The field activities at the site are limited to late Spring through early
Fall due to the high altitude of the property and difficult winter-time access.
The ultimate deliverable for the project is regulatory closure and a
complete transformation of the property to pre-oil field conditions.
Trident Environmental personnel were contracted to prepare a remedial
strategy work plan to address dissolved hydrocarbons in the shallow groundwater
at a tank farm in west Texas.
Based on current and future land uses, the lack of potential receptors,
and the results of a risk assessment, it was concluded that there is low risk
with respect to exposure to human health and the environment from the
hydrocarbon-impacted groundwater on site. Therefore,
monitoring the efficacy of natural attenuation by sampling the existing
monitoring wells on site was chosen as the most practical method for site
remediation.
The data collected to date demonstrates that the hydrocarbon-impacted soil and
groundwater associated with the site is contained within the fenced property
boundaries. An exception is the
northern property boundary that indicates the possibility of upgradient,
off-site sources. It is apparent
that natural attenuation processes have been effective in stabilizing the plume
and preventing continued downgradient migration due to the estimated age of the
release (10 to 40 years) and limited extent of the plume (650 feet).
With the continuation of natural attenuation, the dissolved hydrocarbons
will be reduced and dissipate to background levels as long as there is no
additional source of hydrocarbons introduced on site.
Sampling and monitoring of groundwater conditions were conducted on a quarterly
basis during 1997 and 1998. Analytical
results of pertinent parameters such as benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes
(BTEX), electron acceptors (dissolved oxygen, nitrogen and sulfate), and
by-product constituents (ferrous iron, methane, and carbon dioxide) were used to
determine the status of plume migration or recession.
After the fourth year of monitoring (1998), the data was evaluated to
confirm that the benzene plume is stable and document the progress of natural
attenuation. Site closure with no
further action was requested from the Railroad Commission of Texas (RRC) based
on the following evaluation conclusions:
-
The site
dissolved plume is stable
-
The plume
has no potential to migrate off-site in the downgradient direction
-
The plume
is not a threat to potential off-site receptors
-
Natural
attenuation processes appear to be effective in stabilizing the plume and
preventing downgradient migration
-
Since
December 1994, sampling event analytical data document that benzene
concentrations did not exceed 0.7 milligrams per liter (mg/L), the
representative source concentration used in the site risk assessment
-
The risk
assessment indicated that the plume risk and hazard index to current and
potential future receptors is below acceptable levels
Trident Environmental personnel were retained by GPM Gas Corporation
(GPM) to characterize the extent of mercury-impacted soils at approximately 500
gas meter sites prior to acquiring three west Texas gas gathering systems from a
major gas producing company. Mercury
manometers had been used at approximately 350 of the 500 gas meter sites for gas
flow measurement purposes. Based on
the results of the sampling investigation it was determined that approximately
207 sites would require remediation.
After completion of the characterization phase, Trident personnel prepared a
programmatic engineering cost estimate (PECE) for the remediation and regulatory
closure of the affected meter sites. This
document proved to be highly successful in negotiating a reduction in the asking
price from the seller. The PECE also
included regulatory guidance and a conceptual work plan that detailed the scope
of work required to implement the remediation activities.
The next phase of this on-going project will be to prepare the
remediation work plan, quality assurance/quality control plan, and health and
safety plan for submission to the Railroad Commission of Texas (RRC).
The work plan will be written to comply with applicable Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) requirements and will detail the field
testing procedures to measure mercury content in soils, sampling protocols,
remediation procedures, and specifications for treatment and disposal options.
After approval of the work plan by the RRC, excavation, treatment, and
disposal of the impacted soils will be implemented.
Yates
Petroleum Southeast NM
Preparation of Spill Prevention Control and
Countermeasure (SPCC) Plans
Trident Environmental personnel performed the field investigations and
prepared Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) plans for 39
hydrocarbon production and storage sites in several fields located adjacent to
the Pecos River in southeast New Mexico. The
plans were constructed according to guidelines recommended by the American
Petroleum Institute (API) for compliance with U. S. Environmental Protection
Agency regulations. The reports also
included a photographic inventory of the equipment layout at each site
investigated and a list of procedures and forms for the continued
self-maintenance of the plans. Because
all of the plans were prepared together, the client realized an economy of scale
savings in the overall costs.
GPM
Central Texas
Environmental Site Assessments at
Gas Compressor and Meter Sites
Trident personnel performed
Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs) at six gas compressor sites and 18 meter
stations in the Austin Chalk area of Central Texas.
The investigation was conducted at the request of GPM Gas Corporation
(GPM) to establish pre-acquisition baseline conditions regarding hydrocarbon
impacts to the soil and groundwater from historic operations at each facility.
The results of the investigation were used to demonstrate the current
condition of the system with respect to potential environmental liability and
document the spill history.
The gas compressor sites contained a variety of equipment configurations,
operational standards, and levels of maintenance within a wide range of
geographical and hydrogeological settings. Consequently,
an interpretation of site-specific environmental sensitivity was included based
on local topography, soil types, geology, and potential man-made exposure
pathways.
Trident employees were successful in quickly and efficiently identifying site
operations and equipment that represented potential environmental concerns and
evaluating those concerns by intrusive sampling.
The primary deliverables to GPM were characterization data (ESA reports)
upon which the cost evaluations were based for consultations during the
acquisition costs negotiations.
The information generated from the project led to a fair settlement of
environmental costs which are currently being utilized to bring the purchased
compressor stations into regulatory compliance.
Oil and gas producing companies of all sizes consistently rely on the
expertise Trident Environmental in the evaluation of oil field properties for
the determination of acquisition-related environmental liabilities.
Phase I (or limited Phase I) Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs) are a
necessary part of doing business in the petroleum industry today.
Trident has evaluated oil field properties that range in size from 2 to
over 300 wells, providing reports that are customized to meet our clients
specific requirements.
The Trident professional staff in the Midland, Texas office include personnel
who have spent many years working in the petroleum industry and are familiar
with the equipment and environmental risks associated with oil and gas
production. The results of this
experience for our clients are low cost Phase I ESAs that identify all
environmental concerns. The
identified concerns are evaluated by presenting possible scenarios for
regulatory violation (or legal action) and providing recommendations designed to
limit or eliminate potential financial exposure.
Various
Companies Throughout Texas
Environmental Site Assessment and Health Risk Evaluation
of Underground Storage Tank Release Sites
Trident employees in the Midland, Texas office are certified with the
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) and the New Mexico Environmental
Department (NMED) to manage all phases of underground storage tank (UST) release
investigations and cleanups. Tridents
experience includes over 100 TCEQ and NMED regulated UST projects located in
areas that exhibit a wide range of soil types, hydrogeologic settings, and human
health sensitivities. As the UST
industry has evolved, Trident employees have maintained a position on the
forefront as a leader in cost effective site assessment, risk evaluation, and
hydrocarbon remediation of soils and groundwater.
In each case, the deliverable from Trident is the regulatory closure of
the site either through negotiations with the state agencies, health-based risk
assessment, or remedial action.